Budget updates:
Perdue transfers money into the state’s general fund
Forum discusses furloughs as one option for saving jobs
Community meeting
focuses on budget
situation, layoff policy
Perdue transfers
money into the state's
general fund
|

|
In her recent State of the State address. Gov. Beverly
Perdue vowed to do whatever was necessary to pay the bills.
Last week, she made good on her promise by allocating $787
million from the state’s emergency “rainy day fund” to the general fund, which
is used to pay the state’s general expenses.
Nearly one-third of the money, $250 million, will be used to
bolster the financially ailing State Health Plan for Teachers and State
Employees, and the rest will be reserved to help the state meet its financial
obligations.
The move is not unprecedented. During the 2001 recession, then-Gov.
Mike Easley took
similar action.
And at the beginning of this month, Perdue allocated $300
million from four dedicated accounts, including $87.6 million from the
Education Lottery Reserve Fund, to help close the estimated $2.2 billion gap in
this year’s state budget. Money was also moved from the Clean Water Management
Trust Fund, the Public School Building Capital Fund and the Public School
Textbook Fund.
If the $2.2 billion estimate proves to be correct, it marks
a 10.6 percent decline in revenue that was budgeted for this fiscal year and
5.9 percent less than the state received during the last
fiscal year, according to figures reported by The News & Observer. The
State Budget Office is predicting a deficit for each of the next two fiscal
years topping $3 billion.
Perdue had not submitted her proposed budget for the
2009–10 fiscal year by the time the Gazette went to press, but it was
expected to be released this week.
Health plan
Recent actions of both the governor and the N.C. General
Assembly are designed to get the State Health Plan back on track.
The Senate Appropriations Committee approved legislation
last week to allocate the $250 million Perdue moved into the general fund for
the health plan this fiscal year and an additional $609 million for the next
two fiscal years.
The legislation, which has to be voted on by the Senate and
the House, also would raise co-payments and deductibles for the plan’s more
than 666,000 state employees, teachers
and retirees.
Senate Majority Leader Tony Rand, who sponsored the
legislation, said the bill would have to clear the legislature by the end of
the month for plan changes to take effect July 1. Failure to do so could reduce
savings by 15 percent, Rand said in an interview with The News & Observer.
On campus
Although the full extent of next year’s budget deficit is
not yet known, economic conditions are taking a toll on some of the
University’s planned construction projects.
The latest to feel the pinch is the second phase of
renovations to Kenan Stadium. Construction to add club seats, individual suites
and a new academic center to the south side of the stadium will not start after
the 2009 football season as originally planned, Chancellor Holden Thorp and
athletic director Dick Baddour announced earlier this month.
Rent from the boxes and club seats is expected to pay for
the project in 12 to 14 years. To move forward with plans and approvals so
construction could start in January 2010, the athletic department wanted to
have at least half of the new seats – about 25 to 30 suites and 1,250
club seats – sold by October.
While the project has a high level of support among
University administrators and Educational Foundation members, all agreed the
timing was not right.
The first phase of stadium renovations, however, began last
month and will be completed by September. The Educational Foundation will raise
$18 million to add a fifth floor to the existing football center on the
stadium’s west end.
This project is important, Baddour said, because Carolina’s
two revenue sports – football and men’s basketball – are largely
responsible for supporting the entire 28-sport program. Ticket sales from
football accounted for about $10.3 million of the athletic department’s $61.4
million budget in 2008–09, while men’s basketball tickets accounted for
about $8.8 million.

Forum discusses furloughs as one option for saving jobs
Heightened anxiety over the prospect of some University
employees losing their jobs in the coming fiscal year was a focal point of
discussion at the March 4 Employee Forum meeting.
That anxiety found expression in a debate about employee
furloughs – unpaid time off – as a means to keep more people
working. Any discussion of furloughs is hypothetical, however, unless the
General Assembly authorizes the UNC system to use them.
Alan Moran, a carpenter in Facilities Services who serves on
the forum’s Compensation and Wages Committee, introduced a resolution asking
Chancellor Holden Thorp to keep furloughs from being applied to any employee
who earned below a “living income standard.” In his resolution, Moran defined
that standard as a family with an income equal to twice the federal poverty
level.
Vice Chair Brenda Denzler told Moran she understood the
spirit of the resolution and supported his goals, but it was important to
consider alternatives to a furlough. Without it, she argued, there was the real
possibility that more people, including the people Moran wanted to hold
harmless, could lose their jobs completely.
Denzler also suggested that the resolution, though well
intended, needed to acknowledge the broader context from which the idea of
furloughs sprang.
People have suggested furloughs as a way to use the cost
savings from reduced work hours to help more employees keep their jobs.
While losing income from unpaid leave can be bad, she said,
it can be far worse for people to lose jobs that they may never be able to get
back – something Denzler compared to “having to choose between cutting
off a foot or putting your leg in a cast for the next nine months.”
The resolution will be referred back to various committees
for revision before it is presented to the forum again for action.
Another resolution dealt with the hundreds of tickets that
have been issued to employees who park in the Dogwood Deck on Manning Drive and
the Ambulatory Care Center lot off Mason Farm Road without first getting a
temporary permit to do so. The parking areas are reserved for hospital and
dental school patients and visitors weekdays between 7:30 a.m.
and 5 p.m.
Forum Treasurer Marshall Dietz, a systems analyst for Energy
Services, first raised the issue in January. His resolution, which was
discussed but not voted on, would have called on Thorp to void all the
citations that have been issued and refund the fines employees have paid until
the Department of Public Safety strengthens its efforts to notify employees
about the parking restrictions.
One suggestion was to simplify the wording and look of the
signs posted at the entrances to these parking areas.
Finally, the forum endorsed “The Song of the University
Employee” as the official University staff poem. Its author, Jeffery Beam, was
on hand to read the poem (see Working at Carolina).

Community meeting
focuses on budget
situation, layoff policy
Nearly 400 staff members and students attended a community
meeting with Chancellor Holden Thorp and top administrators on March 2.
Budget
and layoff
overview
Presentations from the March 2 community
meeting are posted online: hr.unc.edu/guides/0302-communitymtg_final.pdf.
The University’s layoff policy applies only to SPA
appointments,
consistent with the requirements of the State Personnel Act and the Office of
State
Personnel. Requirements include:
Employees
are to be laid off only after examining all available alternatives.
Each
department facing the layoff of an employee must make every effort to place the
employee, within or outside the department, before the effective date of
layoff.
All
permanent SPA employees must receive at least 30 days written notice of a layoff.
SPA
layoff benefits include severance pay, health insurance continuation up to one
year for eligible employees, re-employment priority consideration, career
transition counseling services provided through Lee Hecht Harrison, and leave
payout
and reinstatement.
The University does not have a formal layoff policy for EPA
non-faculty positions. Those employment policies provide for:
At-will
appointments (for EPA non-faculty) require either a 30- or 90-day notice for
discontinuation for any reason.
Term
appointments generally end early only if an applicable funding contingency
arises or there is dismissal for cause.
No
notice is required when exercising a funding contingency clause that was
included in the letter of appointment.
Depending on the circumstances, end-of-appointment benefits
for EPA positions could include health insurance continuation and career
transition counseling services. |
The session, organized and sponsored by the Employee Forum,
was called “University Budget 101,” but in reality no one knows yet what next
year’s budget will look like. It was that singular point – it is too
early to offer definitive answers – that Thorp and other speakers
emphasized during the discussion.
The forum invited Thorp, Dick Mann, vice chancellor for
finance and administration, and Brenda Malone, associate vice chancellor for
human resources, to address the group. Vicki Bradley, senior director of
employment, classification and compensation, and Matt Brody, assistant vice
chancellor for human resources, also presented a layoff overview for SPA
employees and EPA non-faculty employees, respectively.
Emerging themes
Some consistent themes emerged, however, including Thorp’s
emphasis that Carolina administrators wanted to help ease the financial burden
on faculty and staff by taking cuts at least as large as those of the rest of
the campus.
Another theme was the efforts of vice chancellors and deans
to trim their budgets wherever possible to prevent job cuts and to assist
affected employees. (Last month, Thorp authorized the creation of an Employee
Assistance Fund to help employees who lose their jobs; refer to hr.unc.edu.)
“I’m convinced that Carolina has what it takes to get
through this crisis,” Thorp said. “We have people here who have been through it
before.”
He told audience members he shared their frustration about
the lingering uncertainty over what might happen. There are reasons to be
worried, he said, but there also are reasons to be hopeful.
For instance, the UNC system is likely to experience smaller
budget cuts than other state agencies. At this point, Gov. Beverly Perdue has
asked the UNC system to undergo 7 percent cuts this year, while many other state agencies have been asked to take
a 9 percent cut.
Both Thorp and Mann said the state would not have a clear
picture of revenues until
April 15 after all state tax returns have been submitted. And it is not yet
altogether clear what impact the federal stimulus package might have on the
University because a great deal of work must be done both in Washington D.C.,
and Raleigh first, Thorp said.
One certainty is that there will be more money for federally
sponsored research – money that would likely create staff support
positions to help manage contracts and grants. The stimulus package should also
include money for “shovel-ready” construction projects, but it is not clear if
any here will be funded.
Thorp spoke about the possible use of temporary furloughs as
a way to reduce layoffs, but the General Assembly has not authorized the
legislation to make that possible, he said.
Campuswide perspective
Thorp admitted that how well he handles the budget situation
could be the most important thing he does as chancellor, because it will affect
not only how well the University weathers the crisis, but also how it will be
positioned to achieve new heights once the crisis has passed.
Several students stood in the back of the room holding
placards supporting staff members keeping their jobs. One student asked Thorp
about the implications of a study of University operations now under way by
Bain & Company, a global business consulting firm.
Thorp said he approved the privately funded study to get an
objective campuswide look at how the University currently operates and how it
can streamline operations and better stretch available resources to fulfill its
mission.
The study will supplement input he has already received from
individual units about ways to reduce costs and will shed light on enhancing
efficiency from a University-wide perspective in areas such as information
technology, purchasing and energy.
An oversight committee consisting of Thorp, Mann and Elmira
Mangum, senior associate provost, will meet with Employee Forum Chair Tommy
Griffin and Faculty Chair Joe Templeton to get their input on the study.
The student asked Thorp to guarantee that privatization, the
cost-cutting practice of converting functions handled by public employees to a
private firm, would not be considered.
Thorp refused, but said it was possible that the Bain &
Company study could generate ideas about using privatization in selective ways
that would make sense financially and could be accepted by the larger
University community.
He emphasized the University’s commitment to transparency
throughout the process.
Both the University’s agreement with Bain & Company and
the scope of work have been posted on the Carolina Budget Information Web page,
universityrelations.unc.edu/budget. Also posted are Thorp’s budget-related
e-mails to campus and the University’s submissions used to develop its response
to the 2009–10 state budget reduction planning scenarios for 3 percent, 5
percent and 7 percent cuts.
Griffin ended the session by thanking panel members for
participating and Forum Vice Chair Brenda Denzler for organizing the event.
“It is a tough situation, but don’t leave here thinking you
are going to be laid off tomorrow,” Griffin said. “I’ve been here 36 years and
these are horrible times, but don’t leave here thinking nobody cares about you
because we do care.”
Griffin reminded people that the University and the country
had been through – and survived – tough times before. And it will
again, he said. |