Research funding at Carolina remains robust

Howard McLeod, left, works with recent Carolina graduate
Anne Dvorak in his lab at the Genetic Medicine Building. McLeod is the Fred
Eshelman Distinguished Professor of Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy
and director of the UNC Institute for Pharmacogenomics and Individualized
Therapy. |
When Howard McLeod joined the Eshelman School of Pharmacy
faculty in 2006, the University gained the expertise of an internationally
recognized researcher in the relationship between genetics and responsiveness
to drugs used in
cancer treatments.
With the scientist came his ability to secure funding for
this cutting-edge research.
In turn, McLeod acquired the resources of a renowned
research university that has historically supported research with a potential
to make a difference in people’s lives.
It is a win-win partnership in which success helps breed
success.
F&A funds help sustain
Carolina research
The University’s recent construction boom, fueled by the
state’s $3.1 billion Higher Education Bond Referendum, has helped create a
network of enhanced research facilities across campus. As a result, attracting
new researchers to Carolina has become a
little easier.
“We’re definitely seeing the impact of that generosity from
the legislature,” said Tony Waldrop, vice chancellor for research and economic
development. “We couldn’t attract quality faculty members without adequate
research facilities.”
Supporting many of these and other University capital
projects are facilities and administrative (F&A) funds, also known as
overhead receipts from contracts and grants. These funds not only help support
the overall cost of doing research, they also help fund capital projects and
debt service on buildings.
Overall, F&A research funds back more than
$300 million in debt service on buildings constructed with money from the bond
referendum.
For new construction, just last year the funds were applied
toward the Science Complex, the Dental Sciences Building and the Research
Resource Facility.
And F&A funds are likely to be applied toward other
upcoming construction projects when the University gets the green light to
proceed with them.
In addition, F&A funds help equip laboratories and
support the University’s broad research compliance efforts. Faculty members
whose research was funded one year but narrowly missed being funded again can
apply F&A funds as a bridge to keep their research and labs going –
and people employed – until they can secure funding.
Statistics from February show that around 1,100 employees
were paid at least in part from the $32.3 million in F&A funds devoted to
salaries campuswide.
Outside research, these funds regularly support areas
including the University’s libraries and a variety of instructional and public
service projects. |
Research funding accounts for about one-third of the
University’s total revenue. Even in a period of flat funding nationally,
Carolina faculty members are among the leaders in attracting federal and other
funding for research. In fact, Carolina set records in research grants and
contracts the past two fiscal years, nearly double the amount received a decade
ago.
Last year’s $678.2 million total was an 11 percent increase
over the record-setting $610 million received the previous year. Further, more
than half of the 2008 total showed a 13 percent gain in grants and contracts
awarded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
“There are very few universities that can make those
claims,” said Tony Waldrop, vice chancellor for research and economic
development. “It shows that we’re doing extremely well, even against the best
of folks.”
While the School of Medicine typically accounts for the
lion’s share of research funding – attracting $356.8 million of last
year’s total – disciplines across the spectrum are vital to the
University’s aggregate success.
As an example, Waldrop points to the Carolina Population
Center, which last year landed a $181 million grant, the University’s largest
ever, to continue its efforts to evaluate health, poverty and gender programs
worldwide.
And the new collaboration among the School of Information
and Library Science, the Renaissance Computing Institute and Data Intensive
Cyber Environments (DICE) – based at the University of California-San
Diego Super Computing Center – brings together nationally prominent
researchers to address the preservation and storage of digital information.
Even in today’s dour economic climate, Carolina’s research
funding is 11 percent ahead of the tally at this time last year, Waldrop said,
and NIH funding has contributed to that marker.
A three-year comparison of NIH funding at Carolina and Duke
University shows the gap closing significantly, he said. In 2005, Duke was
ahead by $94 million, but since has dropped
10 percent while Carolina has climbed 13 percent, closing the gap to a little
more than $20 million in 2008.
Interdisciplinary research
Carolina’s track record helps attract faculty members like
McLeod, who came here because of a culture that encourages researchers to reach
across disciplines.
“As a researcher, you make certain levels of contribution
based on your science, but taking that up a notch requires using other
resources,” he said. “UNC has so many schools and departments that want to work
with you to help you accomplish your goals. I wanted to work in a place with
that philosophy, where the mission is bigger than one person.”
McLeod is the Fred Eshelman Distinguished Professor of
Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy and director of the UNC Institute
for Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy. He also holds appointments in
the School of Medicine and the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Pharmacogenomics explores how information in an individual’s
genes influences how that person responds to specific drugs. The
interdisciplinary institute is working to develop individualized cancer
therapies by bringing together researchers in nursing, pharmacy, medicine,
business, law and journalism, with others from companies such as
GlaxoSmithKline and LabCorp.
Carolina’s emphasis on fostering such multidisciplinary
endeavors has paid off, not only in recruiting and retaining top-rated faculty
members who generate new knowledge, but also in encouraging research to expand
in directions that have been well funded.
“We haven’t changed the way we go after research funding,”
Waldrop said. “Collaboration is something we’ve always done as well as anyone,
and NIH in particular is geared toward collaborative efforts. So this isn’t a change
for us; it’s an expansion.”
Many of the biggest questions in science require expertise
beyond one person or one laboratory, something funding agencies increasingly
recognize, he said.
For example, Carolina landed more grants than any other
university as a result of the 2002 NIH Roadmap for Medical Research, which
provided a framework for NIH priorities and identified ways to maximize its
impact on the progress of medical research.
“Across the board, our faculty have a knack for finding the
leading edge of their respective disciplines and doing the kind of work that’s
valued and supported,” Waldrop said.
Cancer research
Enhancing that success is the impact of the University
Cancer Research Fund (UCRF), approved by the N.C. General Assembly in 2007 to
help propel the University, through the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center,
to national leadership in cancer research and patient care. The legislature
allocated $25 million in 2007, $40 million in 2008 and $50 million in 2009 for
the fund.
Already, the results are transformative. Because of new
initiatives in cancer research, the University has recruited more than 30
people to join the 425-plus faculty, staff and trainees who are partially
supported by UCRF on projects to help unravel cancer’s mysteries and fight the
disease in all its forms.
Newly recruited people represent specialties ranging from
adult and pediatric bone marrow transplant to geriatric oncology, from
oncologists in multiple disease groups to basic cancer geneticists, and from
bioinformatics to drug discovery. Faculty searches are under way for population
scientists, health outcomes and patient support researchers, and cell
biologists and tumor virologists.
“The UCRF is allowing us to support innovative research in
laboratory, clinical and population sciences across the University,” said
Shelton Earp III, professor of medicine and pharmacology and Lineberger Center
director.
“A large-scale project in breast cancer across 44 North
Carolina counties and a 10,000-patient cancer survivorship cohort study are
being launched. These will provide research opportunities at UNC and at other
UNC campuses. Our goal is to make an impact in the lives of patients and their
families through world-leading health cancer research.”
Federal stimulus
Although it is too soon to know the dollar impact the
federal stimulus package will have for Carolina, some NIH funding will
supplement grants that have already been funded, Waldrop said.
To help researchers navigate new funding opportunities
and available resources, the Office of Federal
Affairs and the GrantSource Library have freated a
new Web site, research.unc.edu/recovery, which will
be updated as new information becomes available. |
He also expects to see funding for challenge grants and for
those that narrowly missed funding but were seen as scientifically meritorious.
In addition, the package includes money for infrastructure and for renovating
core facilities.
“If you calculate the same rate of success we’ve had so far
in each of these categories, we should do extremely well,”
Waldrop said.
Research is a team effort. “Beyond the science itself, it
takes quite an infrastructure to manage the grants, take care of the animals,
oversee compliance and coordinate the many other things that have to happen at
the department, school and campus levels,” he said.
In fact, administrators expect the stimulus package to
create a need for additional jobs to support the University’s increasing
research efforts.
|