TABLE OF CONTENTS |
FRONT PAGE
| NEXT ARTICLE |
PREVIOUS ARTICLE |
UNC HOMEPAGE
North Carolina could lose its new congressional seat as a result of a Utah
lawsuit questioning the Congressional reapportionment process in 2000. For
those following the issue, resources available at Carolina's Howard W. Odum
Institute for Research in Social Science may prove valuable.
Utah claims it was cheated out of a congressional seat because, under the
current reapportionment methods, the Census Bureau did not count all Utah
citizens abroad. Because North Carolina figures included those serving overseas
in the military and diplomatic services, Utah feels that its numbers should
include the state's many overseas missionaries.
Thad Beyle, professor of political science, explained, "In the North Carolina
case, there are official governmental counts and records of just how many and
who are serving overseas." Data provided by the defense department, such as
military and diplomats overseas, is official government information. However,
the records and counts on missionaries overseas would be coming from Church of
Latter Day Saints. "There may be a subtle church-state problem here," Beyle
said, including a flood of demands from all other churches with missionaries
and personnel overseas.
Melissa Saunders, professor of law and special counsel to the attorney general
of North Carolina, said the church-state question is the crux of a recent Utah
motion. "Utah's claim is that the Census Bureau's failure to count Utah
citizens who are temporarily overseas on religious missions imposes a burden on
those missionaries' right to the free exercise of their religion," Saunders
said. "I see serious problems with all of their arguments."
A look at census data and terminology offers useful background information in
light of the pending lawsuit. Edward Bachmann, coordinator for the Demographic
Data Service at the Odum Institute, pored over a document published by the
Census Bureau in 1993 and revealed that rules used to define "apportionment"
population have changed repeatedly. Bachmann found that in the 1970s, the
apportionment population was expanded to include military, but the decision was
retracted in 1980 and then reinstated in 1990 and 2000.
The rules have been inconsistent for the military maybe, but not for private
citizens. "Although the bureau has changed its definition of apportionment
population over the years, it has never included in the apportionment
population private citizens living abroad that are not affiliated with the
Federal government," Bachmann said. The Census Bureau counts missionaries the
same as they do college students -- those that are in the United States are
included; those that are overseas are not. "The near impossibility of
systematically locating private citizens abroad is no doubt the basis for this
rule," Bachmann said.
Utah and the U.S. Census Bureau agreed to a quick trial on the state's
challenge of the national count, skipping two preliminary hearings and going to
a three-judge federal panel scheduled for mid-March. Saunders predicts that the
lawsuit, like the handful of apportionment cases brought up in the past, likely
will go to the Supreme Court.
Supreme Court or not, Saunders is confident that in the end the new
congressional seat will be awarded to North Carolina. "I have little doubt that
North Carolina will prevail."
Provided by Graduate Studies and Research
Writer: Jill Aitoro
Editor: Neil Caudle
Odum Institute at a glance
The oldest facility of its kind in the United States, and one of the oldest in
the world, Carolina's Howard W. Odum Institute for Research in Social Science
has evolved into a center offering many diverse services to support the
research and training of social science faculty and students.
The Odum Institute provides access to one of the largest, most extensive
electronic collections of census data in the United States and is affiliated
with the North Carolina State Data Center, a cooperative program with the
Census Bureau headquartered in Raleigh.
"The Odum Institute has collected census data since the 1960s, when the
documents began to be released in electronic form," said Edward Bachmann,
coordinator for the Demographic Data Service at the Odum Institute. Few
institutions at that time were equipped for such a collection -- Carolina was.
As a joint effort, the Census Bureau provided the computers and the University
provided the expertise and the technology to accumulate the data. While Davis Library recently installed similar electronic resources, it does not have the 1960s, or more extensive 1970s and 1980s collection available at Odum.
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
FRONT PAGE
| NEXT ARTICLE |
PREVIOUS ARTICLE |
UNC HOMEPAGE