TABLE OF CONTENTS  |  FRONT PAGE  |  NEXT ARTICLE |  PREVIOUS ARTICLE  |  UNC HOMEPAGE

A search for common ground


Since University trustees approved a new campus plan last month, University officials have been talking with the town of Chapel Hill about amending or removing regulations that could block or delay some of the $1 billion worth of construction projects scheduled for completion over the next decade.

Even before the master plan was completed, Chancellor James Moeser set up a series of joint town-gown meetings to allow both sides raise their respective concerns about growth-related issues. The third of these meetings was held on April 18 and dealt directly with a series of proposals and counter-proposals that the town and University have made to each other over the past month.

And on April 23 the Chapel Hill Town Council voted to approve an accelerated schedule of actions recommended by Rosemary Waldorf, the mayor of Chapel Hill, that by Oct. 1 will establish a process for approval of actions related to Carolina's master plan.

"We were pleased with the strong support of the council for this accelerated program," said Jonathan Howes, chair of the master plan Executive Steering Team. "It will be a big help to the University in meeting its capital needs."

In an April 17 letter Moeser wrote to Waldorf in preparation for the meeting the next day, Moeser outlined a series of actions that the University would be willing to take to help the city deal with the rising costs associated with providing services to a growing University.

Among the steps he outlined were:

Selling some off-campus properties the University owns to return them to the town's tax rolls. This would include some holdings along Franklin Street, which could be turned into storefronts that would contribute to a more dynamic downtown.

Hiring a third-party professional who would look at all the issues related to "fiscal equity" in a fair and impartial manner.

Helping the town to find acceptable sites for new public schools, including the possibility of sites on the University-owned Horace Williams property off Airport Road.

At the same time, Moeser reiterated the importance of reaching a "mutually acceptable resolution" of all zoning and regulatory issues in a speedy fashion.

Moeser's letter had been written in response to an April 9 "statement" from Town Council that asked the University to submit a detailed development plan so that the town could gauge the impact of growth on the town in an array of from public transit to parking to the need to build more public schools. The Town Council also asked that the University present strategies in would use to lessen or "mitigate" the financial impact on the town.

The need for regulatory relief

At the April 18 meeting, Moeser said the sticking point in all this is that the University and town are both looking from different directions. "Regulatory relief is our issue, fiscal equity is yours," Moeser said.

The most pressing of those issues for the University is the rezoning of property north of Mason Farm Road that would allow for the construction of student family housing and the modification of a special use permit that the city issued when then Smith Center was built.

The amendment the University is seeking would allow married student housing to be built in the buffer zone created to separate the campus from nearby neighborhoods.

The failure to get quick clearance from the city to begin construction on the married housing units would have a domino effect of interrupting plans to build new undergraduate residence halls and renovate existing ones.

The town has said that it wants the University to add on-campus housing to accommodate the addition of 3,000 students to limit the impact on the town. In order to that, Moeser said, the University needs the town's help through these zoning changes.

At the same time, existing city law puts a tight lid on the amount of building space that the University is allowed and that lid has to be removed before major projects such as the new Science Complex can begin.

The current law allows 14.1 million square feet of floor space. The University is already close to the limit with 13.7 million square feet of buildings in place or already under construction. The huge construction program planned over the next 10 years requires a higher limit be set.

Waldorf presented a proposal for a development plan through which the town would permit the University to build everything it has planned over the next ten years, plus an additional 10 percent of square footage. The plan would also have a provision that would allow for additional square footage to be added if the need arises.

Joint town and University groups met for the first time on April 23 to begin work on the new ordinance provisions.

"We will work together to try to meet the objectives of both parties," said Jonathan Howes, special assistant to the chancellor and chair of the master planning process.

In addition to planning and zoning issues, fiscal issues will be addressed. Nancy Suttenfield, the University's vice chancellor for finance and administration, and Chapel Hill Town Manager Cal Horton were designated to address these matters.

Waldorf and other members of the town's team said their proposal does not seek to impede the University's desire to expand, but it does call on the University to help the town prepare for and pay for some of the costs the town will bear as the University grows.

`Devil in the details'

Richard Stevens, a University trustees who former served as the Wake County manager, said it was important that the town not try to link its fiscal demands to the speedy resolution of the zoning questions that the University was seeking.

In his remarks, Moeser made it clear that he thought that the various issues should be worked on simultaneously, but one process should not be held hostage to the other, he said.

"The devil is in the details," Moeser said.

In its request for a development plan, for instance, the town was asking for everything from a traffic impact analysis to parking strategies to "impacts" on storm-water runoff and air quality and noise and what "mitigating strategies" the University would employ to keep them under control.

How detailed did they want the data to be? Moeser asked. And what would happen, he wanted to know, if the town expected data the University simply did not have to provide them?

Council member Kevin Foy told Moeser that the town's interest is not in impeding the University's growth but to know what's coming so they can anticipate the costs of providing the array of municipal services that a bigger, more populated campus will require.

But Richard "Stick" Williams said he was disappointed that town officials had focused so much attention on negative impacts without looking at all the many benefits the master plan will foster for the town, from the arts corridor to an environmental plan that seeks to limit storm-water runoff.

Foy acknowledged that the master plan does all of these things, but he also said that the community has expectations for the University that are as high as the University sets for itself.

"Certainly the University needs to be applauded for the work that it's done," Foy said.

In her remarks at the April 18 joint meeting, Waldorf set the town of Chapel Hill and the University have between them 200 years of shared history, most of them harmonious, Waldorf said.

"We value living next to you," Waldorf said, but she said she would not be a good mayor if she did not focus on the importance of making sure the city can provide the services that contribute to making Chapel Hill a beautiful, interesting and safe community.

"It's a good place to live," she said.

Moeser said that he and Waldorf may disagree on the fiscal impact that the University has on the town, but they agree on the importance of working together to both assess and address that impact.

When town officials looks at the University, they focus on the financial burden of providing city services to it. They do so because it's their job to do so, Moeser said. But when he looks at the University, he sees an economic engine, not only for the town, but for the Triangle area and the state. And it's his job to keep that engine running.


TABLE OF CONTENTS  |  FRONT PAGE  |  NEXT ARTICLE |  PREVIOUS ARTICLE  |  UNC HOMEPAGE